Preferential Semantics for the Logic of Comparative Similarity over Triangular and Metric Models
نویسندگان
چکیده
The logic CSL (first introduced by Sheremet, Tishkovsky, Wolter and Zakharyaschev in 2005) allows one to reason about distance comparison and similarity comparison within a modal language. The logic can express assertions of the kind “A is closer/more similar to B than to C” and has a natural application to spatial reasoning, as well as to reasoning about concept similarity in ontologies. The semantics of CSL is defined in terms of models based on different classes of distance spaces. In this work we consider the cases where the distance satisfies the triangular inequality and the one where it is a metric. We show that in both cases the semantics can be equivalently specified in terms of preferential structures. Finally, we consider the relation of CSL with conditional logics and we provide semantics and axiomatizations of conditional logics over distance models with these properties. ∗A full paper containing all the proofs can be found in http://www.lsis.org/alendar/techreports.
منابع مشابه
Comparative Concept Similarity over Minspaces: Axiomatisation and Tableaux Calculus
We study the logic of comparative concept similarity CSL introduced by Sheremet, Tishkovsky, Wolter and Zakharyaschev to capture a form of qualitative similarity comparison. In this logic we can formulate assertions of the form ” objects A are more similar to B than to C”. The semantics of this logic is defined by structures equipped with distance functions evaluating the similarity degree of o...
متن کاملTableau calculi for CSL over minspaces
The logic of comparative concept similarity CSL has been introduced in 2005 by Shemeret, Tishkovsky, Zakharyashev and Wolter in order to express a kind of qualitative similarity reasoning about concepts in ontologies. The semantics of the logic is defined in terms of distance spaces; however it can be equivalently reformulated in terms of preferential structures, similar to those ones of condit...
متن کاملROBUSTNESS OF THE TRIPLE IMPLICATION INFERENCE METHOD BASED ON THE WEIGHTED LOGIC METRIC
This paper focuses on the robustness problem of full implication triple implication inference method for fuzzy reasoning. First of all, based on strong regular implication, the weighted logic metric for measuring distance between two fuzzy sets is proposed. Besides, under this metric, some robustness results of the triple implication method are obtained, which demonstrates that the triple impli...
متن کاملPreferential Semantics for Action Speci cations in First - orderModal Action
In this paper we investigate preferential semantics for declarative speciications in a First Order Modal Action Logic. We address some well known problems: the frame problem, the qualiication problem and the ramiication problem. We incorporate the assumptions that are inherent to both the frame and qualiication problem into the semantics of the modal Action Logic by deening orderings over Dynam...
متن کاملComposite Kernel Optimization in Semi-Supervised Metric
Machine-learning solutions to classification, clustering and matching problems critically depend on the adopted metric, which in the past was selected heuristically. In the last decade, it has been demonstrated that an appropriate metric can be learnt from data, resulting in superior performance as compared with traditional metrics. This has recently stimulated a considerable interest in the to...
متن کامل